Defined scope
The examination question, source, candidate intervals, permitted conclusions, and excluded claims are fixed in writing.
Formal methods
The rules governing the independent review, including what has been completed, what remains provisional, and what cannot be established from a YouTube-derived recording.
Phase 1
Scope, procedure, confidence, evidence, and change controls
The examination question, source, candidate intervals, permitted conclusions, and excluded claims are fixed in writing.
Repository audio files are inventoried with SHA-256 hashes, byte sizes, media metadata, and source limitations.
Raw listening precedes processing and wording prompts. Processing must remain disclosed, conservative, and directly comparable with the source.
Technical findings and speech interpretations use different criteria. Existing speech conclusions remain provisional until rescored and independently reviewed.
Acoustic observations, free responses, proposed wording, alternatives, model output, and confidence decisions are recorded in separate fields.
Method or conclusion changes require a recorded reason. Independent review has a defined checklist and remains explicitly incomplete until performed.
Phase 2
35/35 known-answer checks passed
Known test signals check the actual channel routing, filter presets, gain, selection, looping, and WAV-export behavior in the browser. Results are not treated as complete until all tests have been run and the report has been imported.
Open browser audio validationPhase 3
41/41 known-answer checks passed
The listening interface can now switch between the routed signal before filtering, the processed output, and raw minus processed. This makes the filter's effect directly audible.